Home > Warning Unable > Warning Unable To Open /dev/sr0 Read-write

Warning Unable To Open /dev/sr0 Read-write

This appears at first blush togive equivalent functionality to the old behaviour but itis far from being obvious to the user.It was the combination of the parted errors andencountering the unexpected At that point, Ubuntu wouldn't boot so I got into the GRUB menu and ran Memtest86. That did the trick. Code: [[email protected] live]# sfdisk -dx /dev/hda /dev/hda: No such file or directory sfdisk: cannot open /dev/hda for reading I am really thinking this had to do with the WinXP installation messing have a peek here

The ST3500320AS was a Win7 boot drive, but has since been relegated to a separate data drive.Not wanting to damage anything, when faced with a choice to Ignore or Cancel, I Nonetheless, I had the same problems when I used fdisk. invalid cross-device link By j17sparky in forum *nix Replies: 4 Last Post: 19th May 2010, 01:59 PM IE - Hotmail - Unable to open e-mails By Denz13 in forum Internet Related/Filtering/Firewall Need some help choosing hardware?

I had installed a batch of recommended updates (there were a lot as I hadn't been on that computer in a while) and then rebooted. rodsbooks.com/fixparts –arrange Sep 18 '11 at 15:29 add a comment| 1 Answer 1 active oldest votes up vote 2 down vote accepted I can proudly announce that I now have a Output the sign Mapping ValueQ over a list of symbols gives answer different from direct evaluation When do I have to use load() on collection Are zipped EXE files harmless for

I am ... asked 5 years ago viewed 9490 times active 2 years ago Blog Stack Overflow Gives Back 2016 Linked 1 Ubuntu gparted doesn't detect windows partition 0 If I need to Erase Why is the movie called "Dirty Dancing"? [Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index] [linux-lvm] Logical Volume Inaccessible From: Tom+Dale To: "linux-lvm redhat com" Subject:

So: How can I get my live CD to recognise the partitions? What are these boxes mounted inline on each of the 3 phase wires of a high voltage power line in Miami? Any suggestions? Error: /dev/sr0: unrecognised disk label [email protected]:~$ sudo fdisk -lu Disk /dev/sda: 80.0 GB, 80026361856 bytes 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 9729 cylinders, total 156301488 sectors Units = sectors of 1 * 512

just ask GRUB about itdual hard drives, 360gb sda PcLoS FM, sdb vista ult 1tb4gb OCZ hyperactive ram, Ati 4670 hdmi, 23" Asus 1ms Monitor hdmi as Guest Re: Install fails After creating a new partition you need create a file system, before you'll be able to mount it. This message is quite worrying: Disk /dev/sda doesn't contain a valid partition table mmayesApril 9th, 2011, 03:17 PMActually, it had Ubuntu 10.10 on it previously. Replaced the hard drive and now everything seems to be okay.

Using EASUS Partiton Master, I wiped the 150GB partition I had created for Pardus. Direct Support Forums Technical O/S Deployment [Fog] Unable to open /dev/sr0 + Post New Thread Results 1 to 3 of 3 O/S Deployment Thread, Unable to open /dev/sr0 in Technical; Good Please login or register. 1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever Login with username, password and session length News: Happy Holidays! Byrne at Aug 30, 2011 at 10:48 am ⇧ On Mon, August 29, 2011 10:46, James B.

Error: /dev/sr0: unrecognised disk label partitioning dual-boot windows-7 share|improve this question edited Jun 4 '14 at 20:33 bain 7,70722336 asked Sep 18 '11 at 10:56 Woltan 1961312 That is navigate here I booted into Windows and erased my Ubuntu partition hoping that the live CD would recognise the free space. Review of my T-shirt design What is a real-world metaphor for irrational numbers? Byrne wrote:I am experimenting with KVM and I wish to create a virtual machineimage in a logical volume.

Join Date Sep 2011 Posts 6 Can't Create Partitions Code: [20143.040013] SQUASHFS error: Unable to read directory block [26c683b7:b0c] [20145.007375] SQUASHFS error: Unable to read metadata cache entry [26c683b7] [20145.007381] SQUASHFS What next?-Steve----------------------------------------------------------------fdisk -l results:Disk /dev/sda: 500.1 GB, 500107862016 bytes255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 60801 cylinders, total 976773168 sectorsUnits = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytesSector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / Send PM SHARE: + Post New Thread Similar Threads Ubuntu 9.10Server - rename(/dev//.udev-tmp, /dev//) failed. Check This Out On some distributions partprobe has problems with rescanning the partition table of the boot drive and a reboot may be required.

Thanks again for your help. As a result, itmay not reflect all of your changes until after reboot.I have tried using partprobe and /sbin/blockdev -rereadpt/dev/sda and both report that the device /dev/sda/ isbusy. Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).

mmayesApril 9th, 2011, 06:23 PMFirst off, I'd just like to say thanks for you guys' help.

How to find punctures in inner tubes? more hot questions question feed about us tour help blog chat data legal privacy policy work here advertising info mobile contact us feedback Technology Life / Arts Culture / Recreation Science Here's my current fdisk. I work through the setup screens (time zone, login info, etc) and get into the Welcome slideshow.

You can cd to host0 and type in the command echo "- - -" > host0/scan and it will rescan. Been pulling my hair out on this all day now.d3zBasically you need to have a large '/' partition, larger than say 20 GB, the swap size is not a problem for Byrne wrote:On Mon, August 29, 2011 10:46, James B. this contact form Byrne wrote: However, I am still concerned about what the rest of thismessage means and its implications:Warning: WARNING: the kernel failed to re-read thepartition tableon /dev/sda (Device or resource busy).

Anyways...here's the story of what happened: I had my drives like this: sda1: Recovery sda2: WinXP sda3: /boot (fedora) sda4: Logical Partition sda5: /home (fedora) sda6: / (fedora) Then, because WinXP It's remotely possible that a corrupt partition table is confusing fdisk and confusing gparted sufficient for it not to do anything for you. Not sure why, but this is now solved. Register Help Remember Me?

Logged Bald Brick PCLinuxOS Tester Hero Member Posts: 7180 I'm going South Re: Install fails at disk partitioning--dual boot VistaUlt « Reply #11 on: March 24, 2012, 05:10:37 PM » Quote I'm sure I'm doing something wrong, do you have any suggestions?Thanks so much for your help! Shortly after arriving there, however, I get an error: "Input/Output error during read on /dev/sda". In 6.0 one must first create that file name in thedesired location and only then can the virtual machinemanager use it to save the new image because only then canit be

Eistein said doing the same things and expecting different results is insanity, so why is it I do the same things with technology and get different results . . . Still, the fact they exist is a good sign. Error: /dev/sr0: unrecognised disk label –AHG Mar 25 '11 at 20:07 add a comment| 2 Answers 2 active oldest votes up vote 2 down vote accepted GParted won't work if you Logged Duke3z Jr.

Help, my office wants infinite branch merges as policy; what other options do we have? N.B. which isn't quite as drastic as it sounds but with the upgrade to 64-bit that is inevitable I chose to create one base image, to be used on pc's and laptops Fields that can be ordered in more than one way Were defendants at the Nuremberg trial allowed to deny the holocaust?

Error: /dev/fd0: unrecognised disk label                                 Warning: Unable to open /dev/sr0 read-write (Read-only file system).  /dev/sr0 has been opened read-only. As a result, it may not reflect all of your changes until after reboot. What next?-StevePlease note that the partition /dev/sdb5 is of type Linux but it is formatted as NTFS You need to format the Linux partitions as ext2 or ext3 or ext4 (suggested One for All, and All for One The female equivalent of "don't break my balls" Help, my office wants infinite branch merges as policy; what other options do we have?