Home > Warning Unable > Warning Unable To Open Waldo File

Warning Unable To Open Waldo File

At this time I ran a port scan (Shields Up) to initiate a snort alert, this caused barnyard2 to write the barnyard2.waldo file. tried all the solution available online but no success Plz help #151 Open Segmentation fault at broken connection #155 Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. There still is a scenario in which barnyard2 will fail, manifesting the behaviour i have mentioned in my 2nd comment (which is strongly connected to the main issue i reported in Snort version is GRE (Build 47). http://webinweb.net/warning-unable/warning-unable-to-open-the-configuration-file-etc-powermt-custom.html

Reload to refresh your session. [prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] List: snort-users Subject: [Snort-users] Barnyard2 doesn't read alerts From: Daniele Gallarato

Read 0 records Nov 24 19:11:47 IPCMON01 barnyard2[3612]: Opened spool file '/var/log/snort0/snort.log.1448358329' Nov 24 19:11:47 IPCMON01 barnyard2[3612]: Waiting for new data Snort archive folder : (/var/log/snort0/eth0/archive) -rw------- 1 snort snort 17082 True, the first post contains data about running it with the -n switch, but that data was gathered before i could take a look at the sources, compile barnyard2 with debug Recently, we want to add monitor another LAN port. Already have an account?

Thank you for your time, i'll keep the issue open so it can be closed when that patch is acknowledged. Basically, the binf patch did not check (as my patch did) if the spool file that has been opened is the same one that the "already processed record count" a.k.a. Daniele Gallarato ______________________________________________________ Gli animali sono miei amici...e io non mangio i miei amici. -- George Bernard Shaw -- http://www.saicosamangi.info/ -- 2014-02-13 17:24 GMT+01:00 Joel Esler (jesler) : > On Feb Collaborator binf commented Dec 9, 2011 I will allow my self to say that in the future it would be appreciated if comment / history only target the issue.

I will only post here anything if i notice any problem, but i don't think that will be necessary. And other good work arround would be to stop barnyard before snort in your rule update script this would obviously prevent the race condition. I've tried the -v switch but nothing more detailed gets logged in syslog. Once this was done, I was able to restart snort and barnyard2 was started as well.

Will have a look at the code and hopefully post a patch here as soon as i find any solution. Logged jaysonr Newbie Posts: 9 Karma: +0/-0 Re: Snort - Barnyard2 not working « Reply #3 on: April 08, 2010, 07:03:13 pm » I saw the bug for barnyard, wasn't sure Paranoid S. https://github.com/binf/barnyard2/tree/v2-1.9-FIX_ISSUE_9 <- v2-1.9 https://github.com/binf/barnyard2/tree/COMPLETE_ISSUE_9_FIX <-master Thanks again for reporting.

previous scenario with b2 archiving the old datafile and no snort events in the new one (initial issue reproducing procedure) -> b2 archives the old file, opens the new spoolfile, saves Terms Privacy Opt Out Choices Advertise Get latest updates about Open Source Projects, Conferences and News. Which brings me to not agree with your fix again. The issue is basically sort of a race condition, the basename does not change at all.

Waldo file will get updated/generated when the output plugin process an event. navigate here However, since it has NO idea that this is NOT the spool file it used to track (as loaded from the waldo), it does not set record_start to 0, so it Logged lightenup Newbie Posts: 15 Karma: +0/-0 Re: Snort - Barnyard2 not working « Reply #13 on: April 30, 2010, 08:46:25 pm » James,After reading my last post it might have That was my mistake, there was no reason to limit it to that.

I've searched for some days into the Internet, but with no luck. Then it executes ProcessContinuousWithWaldo at [email protected] which then at [email protected] executes ProcessContinuous using the outdated waldo file data. The -n switch actually only activates the pieces of code in spooler.c at the following lines which have the following purposes: @382 - keep searching for snort log files until we http://webinweb.net/warning-unable/warning-unable-to-open-the-file-registry-software-skipped.html The branch is found here : https://github.com/binf/barnyard2/tree/SpoolerWaldoFix-Legacy Can you confirm that you can't reproduce it using this branch?

Also, there is no log file whatsoever in the folder specified by -l switch. Thank you for your time. FAQ Forum Quick Links Unanswered Posts New Posts View Forum Leaders FAQ Contact an Admin Forum Community Forum Council FC Agenda Forum Governance Forum Staff Ubuntu Forums Code of Conduct Forum

Running with the -n switch also has no effect whatsoever.

You signed out in another tab or window. It it does not, then it means barnyard2 opened a brand new file and no records should be skipped (record_start=0). Since he doesn't trust b2 to archive them (to a different folder from where he can then easily delete them afterwards), he decides to make a script of his own that LiGHTENUP Logged jamesdean Sr.

James do you take paypal donations?-LiGHT Logged lightenup Newbie Posts: 15 Karma: +0/-0 Re: Snort - Barnyard2 not working « Reply #10 on: April 25, 2010, 04:45:03 pm » Humm... I have to create an output on snort.conf output unified2: filename snort.u2, limit 128 then give the comand chown snort.snort /var/log/snort/barnyard2.waldo and run barnyard2 with barnyard2 -c (path)/barnyard2.conf -d /var/log/snort -f Some barnyards keep updating the waldo file as they process the events and work flawlessly, other barnyards have a "stuck" waldo file which mentions a file they already moved to archive, this contact form Sign in to comment Contact GitHub API Training Shop Blog About © 2016 GitHub, Inc.

aval13 commented Nov 22, 2011 Just found out why the "stuck waldo" barnyards do not send any more events to sql. Please don't fill out this field. Into snort.conf I've configured: output unified2: filename snort.log, limit 128 Barnyard2 run as: barnyard2 -D -c /etc/*snort*/barnyard.conf -d /var/log/*snort*/eth1 -w /var/log/*snort*/eth1/barnyard2.waldo -l /var/log/*snort*/eth1 -a /var/log/ *snort*/eth1/archive -f *snort*.log -X /var/lock/barnyard2-eth1.pid If Now, let's analyze how barnyard2 will perform in several cases, with binf patch (no -n switch): snort running, normal b2 restart -> b2 will start, load the waldo file, open the

I found a fix that was actually a little bit simpler , and i would like to know if you can try it out. You seem to have CSS turned off. Using the -n switch does get mentioned at startup, but no events are being sent and the waldo file is not updated. Please refer to our Privacy Policy or Contact Us for more details You seem to have CSS turned off.

You signed in with another tab or window. aval13 commented Dec 5, 2011 Hello. Sorry for the confusion. Thx.

All the barnyards are "Version 2.1.9 (Build 263)", source downloaded via "firnsy/barnyard2" -> Tags -> v2-1.9 (aka commit e48ae8a as far as i can tell). User contributions on this site are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution Share Alike 4.0 International License. After a few tests, seeing that the -n switch made no difference, i quit using it since it didn't fix the problem and its use is not something i actually need.